|
Virus infection can be minimised by deploying proven anti-virus software and regularly updating the associated vaccine files. Many anti-virus companies supply such updates from their Web sites.
|
|
|
|
- Where no agreed response plan is in place, the reactions of users, IT and management are likely to be ad hoc and inadequate, thus possibly turning a containable incident into a significant problem.
|
There are 2 Key Actions providing safeguards against this Information Security Issue. These are available in the registered version of RUSecure.
|
- Lack of an agreed standard or inconsistent deployment of anti-virus software can seriously increase the risk of infection, spread and damage.
|
There are multiple Key Actions providing safeguards against this Information Security Issue. These are available in the registered version of RUSecure.
|
- Failing to update the virus definition files on a regular basis increases the risk of infection from a variant for which you do not have the necessary vaccine. This can cause great damage.
|
There are 2 Key Actions providing safeguards against this Information Security Issue. These are available in the registered version of RUSecure.
|
- A failure to run regular virus scans across all data files on your server(s) reduces the ability to detect and cure a virus before its 'footprint' is identified by a user trying to open the file in question.
|
There are 2 Key Actions providing safeguards against this Information Security Issue. These are available in the registered version of RUSecure.
|
- A lack of user awareness about the risks involved in opening unsolicited e-mails may result in a virus infection spreading throughout your organisation.
|
There are multiple Key Actions providing safeguards against this Information Security Issue. These are available in the registered version of RUSecure.
|